Your path in the tree: Start > Economic Development Technological Change, and Growth > Technological Change: Choices and Consequences

Technological Change: Choices and Consequences

Narrower topics in the RePEc Biblio tree

Crosslinks to topics in other branches of the RePEc Biblio

This RePEc Biblio topic is edited by António Brandão Moniz (Antonio Brandao Moniz) (pmo357). It was first published on 2017-02-15 10:27:22 and last updated on 2017-02-15 16:27:22.

Introduction by the editor

Technologies, technological products, and techniques do not originate on their own but are the result of numerous perspectives, interests, and interactions between various parties (researchers and developers, political decision-makers, entrepreneurs, users, the general public) who co-operate in varying constellations during the different phases of the innovation process. Both real and anticipated impacts of technology can become problematic at every single stage of such a process, demands for strategic knowledge and knowledge for decision-making processes might arise and influence the decisions of the actors. What knowledge is taken into account when developing and approving new technologies? What selection processes influence the decision for or against technological developments in politics or the economy? Expectations of science to offer clear and unambiguous solutions to relevant societal issues can often not be met due to complex social and economical contexts.

Most relevant JEL codes

Most relevant NEP reports

NEP reports are email or RSS notifications about new research in selected fields. Subscriptions are free.

Most relevant research

  1. Robinson, Douglas K.R. & Rip, Arie & Mangematin, Vincent, 2007, "Technological agglomeration and the emergence of clusters and networks in nanotechnology," Research Policy, Elsevier, volume 36, issue 6, pages 871-879, July.
  2. Ian Miles, 2008, "Scenarios and Road Mapping for KeyTechnologies: Flood and Coastal Defence in Great Britain," Foresight and STI Governance, National Research University Higher School of Economics, volume 2, issue 4, pages 50-59.
  3. Krings, Bettina, 2005, "Hen or Egg? The relationship between IC-technologies and social exclusion," MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany, number 9568, Jun, revised Feb 2005.
  4. Glachant, Matthieu & Dussaux, Damien & Meniere, Yann & Dechezlepretre, Antoine, 2013, "Greening global value chains : innovation and the international diffusion of technologies and knowledge," Policy Research Working Paper Series, The World Bank, number 6467, May.
  5. Comin, Diego & Mestieri, Marti, 2014, "Technology Diffusion: Measurement, Causes and Consequences," CEPR Discussion Papers, Centre for Economic Policy Research, number 10163, Sep.
  6. Färnstrand Damsgaard, Erika, 2012, "Exhaustible resources, technology choice and industrialization of developing countries," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, volume 34, issue 3, pages 271-294, DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.12.004.
  7. Haiwen Zhou & Ruhai Zhou, 2016, "A Dynamic Model of the Choice of Technology in Economic Development," Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, Higher Education Press, volume 11, issue 3, pages 498-518, September.
  8. Eleni Stathopoulou, 2014, "Environmental campaigns and endogenous technology choice under international oligopoly," Discussion Papers in Economics, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester, number 14/10, Jul.
  9. Daron Acemoglu & Amy Finkelstein, 2008, "Input and Technology Choices in Regulated Industries: Evidence from the Health Care Sector," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, volume 116, issue 5, pages 837-880, October, DOI: 10.1086/595014.
  10. Neven, David & Peterson, H. Christopher & Weatherspoon, Dave D., 2001, "Economic And Social Consequences Of Biotechnology: A Scenario Analysis," Staff Paper Series, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, number 11498, DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.11498.
  11. Dutta, Dilip & Otsuka, Kozo, 2004, "Knowledge Spillover from Information and Communication Technology: A Comparative Study of Australia, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan," Working Papers, University of Sydney, School of Economics, number 8, Nov.
  12. Richard Day, 2008, "The technology evolving culture: character and consequence," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, volume 18, issue 3, pages 313-322, August, DOI: 10.1007/s00191-008-0093-9.
  13. Xue, Dayuan & Tisdell, Clement A., 1999, "Safety and Socio-Economic Issues Raised by Modern Biotechnology," Economics, Ecology and Environment Working Papers, University of Queensland, School of Economics, number 47995, Aug, DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.47995.
  14. Ian Miles, 2010, "Nanotechnology Foresight: How Can We Explore Employment and Skills Implications?," Foresight and STI Governance, National Research University Higher School of Economics, volume 4, issue 1, pages 20-36.
  15. McManus, M.C., 2012, "Environmental consequences of the use of batteries in low carbon systems: The impact of battery production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, volume 93, issue C, pages 288-295, DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.062.
  16. António B. Moniz & Bettina-Johanna Krings, 2016, "Robots Working with Humans or Humans Working with Robots? Searching for Social Dimensions in New Human-Robot Interaction in Industry," Societies, MDPI, volume 6, issue 3, pages 1-21, August.