Your path in the tree: Start > Environmental and Natural Resource Economics > Environmental Economics > Valuation

Valuation

Narrower topics in the RePEc Biblio tree

This RePEc Biblio topic is edited by Richard S.j. Tol (pto90). It was first published on 2012-12-23 02:26:27 and last updated on 2024-10-10 15:36:25.

Introduction by the editor

Valuation methods estimate the price of (environmental) goods and services that are not traded on markets, by using revealed preferences in related markets (travel cost, hedonic pricing), by using stated preferences (contingent valuation, choice experiments), or by benefit transfer.

Most relevant JEL codes

Most relevant NEP reports

NEP reports are email or RSS notifications about new research in selected fields. Subscriptions are free.

Most relevant research

  1. Alan Randall, 1994, "Difficulty with the Travel Cost Method," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, volume 70, issue 1, pages 88-96.
  2. Trudy Ann Cameron, 1992, "Combining Contingent Valuation and Travel Cost Data for the Valuation of Nonmarket Goods," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, volume 68, issue 3, pages 302-317.
  3. Mingche M. Li & H. James Brown, 1980, "Micro-Neighborhood Externalities and Hedonic Housing Prices," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, volume 56, issue 2, pages 125-141.
  4. Benson, Earl D & Hansen, Julia L. & Schwartz Jr., Arthur & Smersh, Greg T., 1998, "Pricing Residential Amenities: The Value of a View," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, volume 16, issue 1, pages 55-73, January.
  5. Kahneman, Daniel & Knetsch, Jack L., 1992, "Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, volume 22, issue 1, pages 57-70, January.
  6. Richard Carson & Nicholas Flores & Norman Meade, 2001, "Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, volume 19, issue 2, pages 173-210, June, DOI: 10.1023/A:1011128332243.
  7. Wiktor Adamowicz & Peter Boxall & Michael Williams & Jordan Louviere, 1998, "Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, volume 80, issue 1, pages 64-75.
  8. Nick Hanley & Robert Wright & Vic Adamowicz, 1998, "Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, volume 11, issue 3, pages 413-428, April, DOI: 10.1023/A:1008287310583.
  9. Brouwer, Roy, 2000, "Environmental value transfer: state of the art and future prospects," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, volume 32, issue 1, pages 137-152, January.
  10. Kirchhoff, Stefanie & Colby, Bonnie G. & LaFrance, Jeffrey T., 1997, "Evaluating the Performance of Benefit Transfer: An Empirical Inquiry," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, volume 33, issue 1, pages 75-93, May.
  11. Heinz Welsch, 2002, "Preferences over Prosperity and Pollution: Environmental Valuation based on Happiness Surveys," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, volume 55, issue 4, pages 473-494, November, DOI: 10.1111/1467-6435.00198.
  12. Catherine L. Kling & Daniel J. Phaneuf & Jinhua Zhao, 2012, "From Exxon to BP: Has Some Number Become Better Than No Number?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, volume 26, issue 4, pages 3-26, Fall.