Hypothetical bias
Narrower topics in the RePEc Biblio tree
- No sub-topic listed. You can volunteer to create one by contacting the editor of this entry.
This RePEc Biblio topic is edited by John C. Whitehead (pwh15). It was first published on 2013-02-26 11:05:48 and last updated on 2013-02-26 20:10:51.
Most relevant JEL codes
- Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics -- Environmental Economics --- Valuation of Environmental Effects
Most relevant research
- Laura O. Taylor & Ronald G. Cummings, 1999, "Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, volume 89, issue 3, pages 649-665, June.
- John List & Craig Gallet, 2001, "What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, volume 20, issue 3, pages 241-254, November, DOI: 10.1023/A:1012791822804.
- Patricia Champ & Richard Bishop, 2001, "Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, volume 19, issue 4, pages 383-402, August, DOI: 10.1023/A:1011604818385.
- James Murphy & P. Allen & Thomas Stevens & Darryl Weatherhead, 2005, "A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, volume 30, issue 3, pages 313-325, March, DOI: 10.1007/s10640-004-3332-z.
- Murphy, James J. & Allen, P. Geoffrey & Stevens, Thomas H. & Weatherhead, Darryl, 2003, "A Meta-Analysis Of Hypothetical Bias In Stated Preference Valuation," Working Paper Series, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Department of Resource Economics, number 14518, DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.14518.
- John A. List, 2001, "Do Explicit Warnings Eliminate the Hypothetical Bias in Elicitation Procedures? Evidence from Field Auctions for Sportscards," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, volume 91, issue 5, pages 1498-1507, December.
- John List, 2001, "Do explicit warnings eliminate the hypothetical bias in elicitation procedures? Evidence from field auctions for sportscards," Framed Field Experiments, The Field Experiments Website, number 00163.
- Johnston, Robert J., 2006, "Is hypothetical bias universal? Validating contingent valuation responses using a binding public referendum," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, volume 52, issue 1, pages 469-481, July.Unknown
- Johannesson, Magnus & Blomquist, Glenn C. & Blumenschein, Karen & Johansson, Per-olov & Liljas, Bengt & O'Conor, Richard M., 1999, "Calibrating Hypothetical Willingness to Pay Responses," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, volume 18, issue 1, pages 21-32, April.
- Karen Blumenschein & GlennC. Blomquist & Magnus Johannesson & Nancy Horn & Patricia Freeman, 2008, "Eliciting Willingness to Pay Without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, volume 118, issue 525, pages 114-137, January.
- Karen Blumenschein & Glenn C. Blomquist & Magnus Johannesson & Nancy Horn & Patricia Freeman, 2008, "Eliciting Willingness to Pay Without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, volume 118, issue 525, pages 114-137, January, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02106.x.
- Vossler, Christian A. & Kerkvliet, Joe & Polasky, Stephen & Gainutdinova, Olesya, 2003, "Externally validating contingent valuation: an open-space survey and referendum in Corvallis, Oregon," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, volume 51, issue 2, pages 261-277, June.
- Herriges, Joseph & Kling, Catherine & Liu, Chih-Chen & Tobias, Justin, 2010, "What are the consequences of consequentiality?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, volume 59, issue 1, pages 67-81, January.
- Herriges, Joseph A. & Kling, Catherine L. & Liu, Chih-Chen & Tobias, Justin, 2009, "What Are the Consequences of Consequentiality?," Staff General Research Papers Archive, Iowa State University, Department of Economics, number 13034, Mar.
- Herriges, Joseph & Kling, Catherine L. & Liu, Chih-Chen & Tobias, Justin, 2010, "What are the consequences of consequentiality?," ISU General Staff Papers, Iowa State University, Department of Economics, number 201001010800001561, Jan.
- John Loomis, 2011, "What'S To Know About Hypothetical Bias In Stated Preference Valuation Studies?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, volume 25, issue 2, pages 363-370, April.
- Thomas C. Brown & Patricia A. Champ & Richard C. Bishop & Daniel W. McCollum, 1996, "Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations to a Public Good?," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, volume 72, issue 2, pages 152-166.
- Schlapfer, Felix & Roschewitz, Anna & Hanley, Nick, 2004, "Validation of stated preferences for public goods: a comparison of contingent valuation survey response and voting behaviour," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, volume 51, issue 1-2, pages 1-16, November.
- Whitehead, John C. & Cherry, Todd L., 2007, "Willingness to pay for a Green Energy program: A comparison of ex-ante and ex-post hypothetical bias mitigation approaches," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, volume 29, issue 4, pages 247-261, November.